MARCH 3 INTRODUCTION TO LITHIC TECHNOLOGY
Banning, E.
2000 Chapter
8: Analyzing Lithics, pp. 141-151. In The Archaeologists’s Laboratory:The
Analysis of Archaeological Data. Kluwer, New York
Crabtree, D. E.
1972 Part I: An Introduction to the Technology of
Stone Tools. In An Introduction to Flintworking, pp. 1-29. Occasional Papers of the
Idaho State University Museum, Number 28. Pocatello, Idaho. (skim Part II: A
Glossary of Flintworking Terms, pp. 33-98)
Cotterell, B. and J. Kamminga
1990 Stone Tools.
In Mechanics of Pre-Industrial Technology,
pp. 125-159. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Steffen, A., E. J. Skinner and P. W. Ainsworth
1997 A View to the Core: Technological Units and
Debitage Analysis. In Unit Issues in Archaeology: Measuring Time,
Space, and Material, edited by A. F. Ramenofsky and A. Steffen, pp.
131-146. The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
See
Also: Cotterell and Kamminga (1979, 1987),
Inizan et al (1992), Moffat (1981), Speth (1972)
MARCH 7 SULLIVAN AND ROZEN'S DEBITAGE
CLASSES
Sullivan, A. P. and K. C. Rozen
1985 Debitage Analysis and Archaeological
Interpretation. American Antiquity
50:755-779.
Amick, D. S. and R. P. Mauldin
1989 Comments on Sullivan and Rozen's "Debitage
Analysis and Archaeological Interpretation". American Antiquity 54:166-168.
Rozen, K. C. and A. P. Sullivan
1989 Measurement, Method, and Meaning in Lithic
Analysis: Problems with Amick and Mauldin's Middle-Range Approach. American Antiquity 54:169-175.
Kuijt, I., W. C. Prentiss and D. L. Pokotylo
1995 Bipolar Reduction: An Experimental Study of
Debitage Variability. Lithic Technology
20:116-127.
Amick, D. S. and R. P. Mauldin
1997 Effects of Raw Material on Flake Breakage
Patterns. Lithic Technology 22:18-32.
See
Also: Ensor and Roemer (1989), Kuijt and
Russell (1993), Mauldin and Amick (1989), Prentiss and Romanski (1989), Rozen
and Sullivan (1989), Sullivan (1987, 2001)
MARCH 24: MEASURING TECHNOLOGICAL
VARIATION: CORE REDUCTION AND ITS RESIDUE
Baumler, M. F.
1988 Core Reduction, Flake Production, and the
Middle Paleolithic Industry of Zobište (Yugoslavia). In Upper Pleistocene
Prehistory of Western Eurasia, edited by H. L. Dibble and A. Montet-White,
pp. 255-273. University Museum Monograph 54. The University Museum, University
of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Kelly, Robert L.
1988
Three Sides of a
Biface. American Antiquity 53: 717-734.
Kuhn, S. L.
1995 Core Reduction Technology. In Mousterian
Lithic Technology: An Ecological Perspective, pp. 81-123. Princeton
University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Larsen, M.L and M. Kornfeld
1997 Chipped Stone Nodules: Theory, Method and
Examples. Lithic Technology 22: 4-18
Shott, M. J.
1994 Size and Form in the Analysis of Flake Debris:
Review and Recent Approaches. Journal of
Archaeological Method and Theory 1:69-110.
Bradbury, A. and P. J. Carr
1995 Flake Typologies and Alternative Approaches: An
Experimental Assessment. Lithic
Technology 20:100-115.
See
Also: Ahler (1989, 1989), Burton (1980),
Fish (1979, 1981), Ingbar et al (1989), Morrow (1997), Odell (1989), Parry
(1987), Patterson (1990), Stahle and Dunn (1982, 1984), Teltser (1991) Tomka
(1989; 2001)
MARCH 31 HAFTED BIFACE TYPOLOGIES: THE
FLENNIKEN-THOMAS DEBATE
Thomas, D. H.
1981 How to Classify the Projectile Points from
Monitor Valley, Nevada. Journal of
California and Great Basin Anthropology 3:7-43.
Flenniken, J. J. and A. W. Raymond
1986 Morphological Projectile Point Typology:
Replication Experimentation and Technological Analysis. American Antiquity 51:603-614.
Thomas, D. H.
1986 Points on Points: A Reply to Flenniken and
Raymond. American Antiquity
51:619-627.
Flenniken, J. J. and P. J. Wilke
1989 Typology, Technology, and Chronology of Great
Basin Dart Points. American
Anthropologist 91:149-158.
Bettinger, R. L., J. F. O'Connell and D. H. Thomas
1991 Projectile Points as Time Markers in the Great
Basin. American Anthropologist
93:166-173.
Rondeau, M. F.
1996 When Is an Elko? In Stone Tools: Theoretical
Insights into Human Prehistory, edited by G. H. Odell, pp. 229-243. Plenum
Press, New York.
Beck, C.
1998 Projectile Point Types as Valid Chronological
Units. In Unit Issues in Archaeology: Measuring Time, Space, and Material,
edited by A. F. Ramenofsky and A. Steffen, pp. 21-40. The University of Utah
Press, Salt Lake City.
See
Also: Beck (1995), Christenson (1987),
Flenniken (1984, 1985), Hoffman (1986), Thomas (1986), Titmus and Woods (1986),
Towner and Warburton (1990), Young and Bonnichsen (1984, 1985)
"... the
initial question which I asked myself was, what is Bordes' taxonomy
measuring? It is quite easy to defend
the position, since any taxonomy is an instrument for measurment, that the
answer to the question, what does a given taxonomy measure, is central to
prehistory" Lewis Binford (1973:244-245)
READINGS LIST
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ahler, S. A.
1989 Experimental Knapping with KRF and Midcontinent
Cherts: Overview and Applications. In
Experiments in Lithic Technology,
edited by D. S. Amick and R. P. Mauldin, pp. 199-234. BAR International Series
528. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.
1989 Mass Analysis of Flaking Debris: Studying the
Forest Rather than the Tree. In Alternative Approaches to Lithic Analysis,
edited by D. O. Henry and G. H. Odell, pp. 85-118. Archeological Papers of the
American Anthropological Association Number 1.
Beck, C.
1995 Functional Attributes and the Differential
Persistence of Great Basin Dart Forms. Journal
of California and Great Basin Anthropology 17:222-243.
Burton, J.
1980 Making Sense of Waste Flakes: New Methods for
Investigating the Technology and Economics Behind Chipped Stone Assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science
7:131-148.
Christenson, A. L.
1987 Projectile Points: Eight Millenia of Projectile
Change on the Colorado Plateau. In Prehistoric Stone Technology on Northern
Black Mesa, Arizona, edited by W. J. Parry and A. L. Christenson, pp.
143-198. Occasional Paper No. 12. Center for Archaeological Investigations,
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.
Cotterell, B. and J. Kamminga
1979 The Mechanics of Flaking. In Lithic Use-Wear Analysis,
edited by B. Hayden, pp. 97-112. Academic Press, New York.
1987 The Formation of Flakes. American Antiquity 52:675-708.
Ensor, H. B. and E. Roemer, Jr.
1989 Comments on Sullivan and Rozen's Debitage
Analysis and Archaeological Interpretation. American
Antiquity 54:175-178.
Fish, P. R.
1979 The
Interpretive Potential of Mousterian Debitage. Arizona State University
Anthropological Research Papers No. 16, Tempe.
1981 Beyond Tools: Middle Paleolithic Debitage
Analysis and Cultural Inference. Journal
of Anthropological Research 37:374-386.
Flenniken, J. J.
1984 The Past, Present, and Future of Flintknapping:
An Anthropological Perspective. Annual
Review of Anthropology 13:187-203.
1985 Stone Tool Reduction Techniques as Cultural
Markers. In Stone Tool Analysis: Essays in Honor of Don E. Crabtree, edited by
M. G. Plew, J. C. Woods and M. G. Pavesic, pp. 265-276. University of New
Mexico Press, Albuquerque.
Hoffman, C. M.
1986 Projectile Point Maintenance and Typology:
Assessment with Factor Analysis and Canonical Correlation. In For Concordance in
Archaeological Analysis, edited by C. Carr, pp. 566-612. Westport
Publishers, Kansas City.
Ingbar, E. E., M. L. Larson and B. A. Bradley
1989 A Nontypological Approach to Debitage Analysis. In Experiments
in Lithic Technology, edited by D. S. Amick and R. P. Mauldin, pp. 117-136.
British Archaeological Reports International Series 528, Oxford.
Inizan, M. L., H. Roche and J. Tixier
1992 Technology of Knapped Stone. Préhistoire
de la Pierre Taillée Tome 3. CREP, Meudon.
Kuijt, I. and K. W. Russell
1993 Tur Imdai Rockshelter, Jordan: Debitage
Analysis and Historic Bedouin Lithic Technology. Journal of Archaeological Science 20:667-680.
Mauldin, R. P. and D. S. Amick
1989 Investigating Patterning in Debitage from
Experimental Bifacial Core Reduction.
In Experiments in Lithic Technology,
edited by D. S. Amick and R. P. Mauldin, pp. 67-88. BAR International Series
528. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.
Moffat, C. R.
1981 The Mechanical Basis of Stone Flaking: Problems
and Prospects. Plains Anthropologist
26:195-212.
Morrow, T. A.
1997 A Chip Off the Old Block: Alternative
Approaches to Debitage Analysis. Lithic
Technology 22:51-69.
1989 Experiments in Lithic Reduction. In Experiments
in Lithic Technology, edited by D. S. Amick and R. P. Mauldin, pp. 163-198.
BAR International Series 528. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.
Parry, W. J.
1987 Technological Change: Temporal and Functional
Variability in Chipped Stone Debitage.
In Prehistoric Stone Technology on
Northern Black Mesa, Arizona, edited by W. J. Parry and A. L. Christenson,
pp. 199-256. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper No. 12,
Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.
Patterson, L. W.
1990 Characteristics of Bifacial-Reduction
Flake-Size Distribution. American
Antiquity 55:550-558.
Prentiss, W. C. and E. J. Romanski
1989 Experimental Evaluation of Sullivan and Rozen's
Debitage Typology. In Experiments in Lithic Technology, edited
by D. S. Amick and R. P. Mauldin, pp. 89-99. BAR International Series 528.
British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.
Rozen, K. C. and A. P. Sullivan
1989 The Nature of Lithic Reduction and Lithic
Analysis: Stage Typologies Revisited. American
Antiquity 54:179-184.
Speth, J. D.
1972 Mechanical Basis of Percussion Flaking. American Antiquity 37:34-60.
Stahle, D. W. and J. E. Dunn
1982 An Analysis and Application of the Size
Distribution of Waste Flakes from the Manufacture of Bifacial Stone Tools. World Archaeology 14:84-97.
1984 An
Experimental Analysis of the Size Distribution of Waste Flakes from Biface
Reduction. Arkansas Archeological Survey Technical Paper No. 2,
Fayetteville.
Sullivan, A. P.
1987 Probing the Sources of Lithic Assemblage
Variability: A Regional Case Study Near the Homolovi Ruins, Arizona. North American Archaeology 8:41-71.
Sullivan, A. P.
2001
Holmes’s Principle
and Beyond: The Case for Renewing Americanist Debitage Analysis
In Lithic Debitage: Context, Form, and Meaning,
edited by. W. Andrefsky Jr, pp. 192-206.
University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City
Teltser, P. A.
1991 Generalized Core Technology and Tool Use: A
Mississippian Example. Journal of Field
Archaeology 18:363-375.
Titmus, G. L. and J. C. Woods
1986 An Experimental Study of Projectile Point
Fracture Patterns. Journal of California
and Great Basin Anthropology 8:37-49.
Thomas, D. H.
1986 Contemporary Hunter-Gatherer Archaeology in
America. In American Archaeology Past and Future: A Celebration of the Society for
American Archaeology 1935-1985, edited by D. J. Meltzer, D. D. Fowler and
J. A. Sabloff, pp. 237-276. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.
Tomka, S. A.
1989 Differentiating Lithic Reduction Techniques: An
Experimental Approach. In Experiments in Lithic Technology, edited
by D. S. Amick and R. P. Mauldin, pp. 137-161. BAR International Series 528.
British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.
2001
The Effects of
Processing Requirements on Reduction Strategies and Tool Form. In Lithic
Debitage: Context From, and Meaning, edited by W. Andrefsky, pp. 207-223. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
Towner, R. H. and M. Warburton
1990 Projectile Point Rejuvenation: A Technological
Analysis. Journal of Field Archaeology
17:311-321.
Young, D. E. and R. Bonnichsen
1984 Understanding
Stone Tools: A Cognitive Approach. Peopling of the Americas Process Series
No. 1. University of Maine, Orono.
1985 Cognition, Behavior, and Material Culture. In Stone
Tool Analysis: Essays in Honor of Don E. Crabtree, edited by M. G. Plew, J.
C. Woods and M. G. Pavesic, pp. 91-131. University of New Mexico Press,
Albuquerque.