Anthropology 160 - The Human Life Course

 

Lecture 3 – Types of natural selection

 

Types of selection

1. Stabilizing (indicates tradeoffs)

a. Gestation time among pigs

b. Fertility

c. Interbirth intervals Blurton Jones, Kung

c. Ache height and hunting ability

d. Human brain size

 

2. Directional

The human brain

The changing importance of IQ

 

3. Disruptive Two or more morphologies

Sexual selection - sexual dimorphism

Humans, red deer vs. gibbons

Orangutans, males come in 2 morphologies

 

Intensity of selection

 

For humans it would take only 10,000 years for a trait with a 1% disadvantage to change from 99% frequency to less than a 1% frequency as long as selection is consistent and unidirectional.

 

Even trivial traits can be associated with reproductive success

Head roundness and differential survival

 

No trait is adaptive in all environments

The brain

 

Reaction to heat and body fat     cf. reaction to cold and body fat

 

Time available for Evolution

 

Common objections to applying evolutionary theory to human behavior

 

1.      Natural selection works fine on morphology and physiology, but the interesting thing to study about humans is their behavior and natural selection does not work on behavior

2.      humans are unique: they have heavy reliance on learning, behavior varies culturally and not genetically, humans possess language and language is related to culture -through language, people pass on culture from one generation to next.  Free us from the tyranny of our genes

3.      Biol. Evolution based upon differential propagation of genes - slow process, many generations for small amounts of genetic change - human change very rapid - e.g. demographic transition - Differential propagation of genes cannot explain demographic transition (or can it?)

4.      Humans engage in many behaviors counter to their genetic fitness: suicide, smoking, reproductive restraint to avoid overpopulation

 

Class today will show that these objections are not valid

 

Can behavior evolve?

 

The dung fly story - Geoffrey Parker

Dungfly females - mature a large quantity of eggs, store until ready for oviposition

look for suitable dung to place larvae in, first flies to and past to upwind side, than cautiously moves to dung surface to oviposit

store sperm but no problem many males, site for sperm competition

males -flock to dung 4-5 males to every female

male sights female, leaps, mounts, orients and mates immediately - penis like a plunger tries to force out old sperm, success partly based on how long male copulates

After ejaculation, hangs on while female is ovipositing.  other males attack mated pair to displace male.  Male guards and fights other male off with middle legs while he holds on with first and third pairs

what is a male to do about all those other males?

three types of females from male point of view: arriving, copulating and ovipositing

arriving females (free for copulation) best bet

copulating (struggle but haven't oviposit)

ovipositing (only some eggs left to be fertilized)

1st 20 minutes - females are in five zones

a. dung surface b. grass area surrounding within 20 cm (8 inches) c. 20-40 cm from edge d. 40-60 f. 60-80

 

Where to wait

Males will place themselves in zones so that all achieve relative equal numbers of copulations (ideal-free distribution) (figure 8.3)

 

How long to mate

The longer a male mates with a female the more sperm from the previous male he displaces, but at a diminishing rate.  There is a tradeoff between the proportion of the females eggs he fertilizes and the possibility of finding another female.  Given an average expected search time for the next female, there is an optimum amount of time to spend in copula with the female.  Flies spend very close to the optimum (fig 8.6). 

 

Can we show that natural selection can act on behavior?

 

It is possible to select for behavioral traits

 

William Cade and Cricket calling times

He took males with different calling times and selected from the distribution two groups: short and long callers.  He mated them with females at random.  After one generation, there were significant differences between the two groups.  Those differences became increasing large with each generation of selection

 

Genetics of behavioral differences among humans - twin studies reared apart in figure

Identical twins are more similar to one another than fraternal twins, both morphologically and behaviorally.  IQ as well (Table 5.1).

 

Even environmentally flexible behavior is predictable according to the effects of natural selection

 

The case of blue gill sunfishes.

There are two major types of males:  Parentals and cuckolders.

Parentals delay maturation until 7 years of age.  They build nests to protect offspring and attract females.  females release eggs by nest and males release sperm to fertilize eggs, and males guard the eggs.

Cuckolders start reproducing at age 2 and provide no care.  They wait near a parental male’s nest and dart in ejecting sperm during the spawning with the parental male; thus gaining matings and parasitizing the care of parental males.

The payoff to cuckolders depends on the environment.  In weedy areas, cuckolders do better when they are alone.  They can hide and if there are few other cuckolders, most of the additional fertilizations are theirs.  When there is low cover, they do better in bigger numbers, because they can distract the bigger parental males.  The number of cuckolders systematically corresponds to % cover in predicted fashion.

It is also probably the case that many cuckolders become parentals after they grow.

 

Distinction between genotype and phenotype

1.      Genotype is the particular combination of genes possessed by an individual

2.      Phenotype is the suite of actual characteristics or traits exhibited by the living organisms.

3.      Sometimes phenotypes vary predictably with genotype as in the case of cricket calling and personality characteristics

4.      Often phenotypes can vary according to the environment, even when genotype is held constant

 

Example of stature in room, perhaps 95% genetically determined, can bet that everyone here had adequate nutrition during development, if room was filled with representative sample of the world’s population, would have to change the percentage determined by genes, perhaps down to 50% or less.  Nutritional differences come into play.  Cannot make statements about what percentage is environmentally or genetically determined without specifying what population and what environment-

examples are a) distribution of other dungfly males affects the best zone to be in b) % cover in sunfish; c) age in sunfish

 

5.      Give rise to the concept of evolved reaction norms.  What evolves is not the behavior itself but the response to given environmental and personal conditions.

6.      Environment comes in at two points: it turns genotypes into phenotypes and selects among phenotypes: nutrition very important in determining phenotype

 

 

Tinbergen’s 4 levels of causation:

1.      function or adaptive value, male rage

2.      mechanism, physiological, neurotransmitters, male rage

3.      ontogeny, development, expression can  be suppressed, punished or modeled in environment of growth

4.      phylogenetic or species history, sets range of options, humans and other higher primates can’t choose to have litters or external fertilization under normal conditions, only in fertility clinics